Medical Review Policy
Last updated: 2026-07-15
This page explains, honestly, where this site currently stands on medical review — including what has not yet been completed.
Current status
Articles on this site are researched against authoritative public health sources (for example the CDC, NIH/NIAID, MedlinePlus, AAAAI, and ACAAI), but as of this policy's last update, content has not yet completed a formal, individually verified clinical review by a named, credentialed medical reviewer with confirmed consent to be listed on this site.
An earlier version of this site displayed a named medical reviewer and reviewer credentials on individual articles. That reviewer's identity and consent to be associated with this site could not be independently verified, so those claims and the associated schema markup have been removed rather than left in place unverified.
What “medically reviewed” will mean here
When this site does add formal medical review, we will name the reviewer, state their credentials, link to a way to verify those credentials, and confirm the reviewer has consented to be listed. We will not display a reviewer badge, name, or date on a page unless that review genuinely took place.
What we do in the meantime
Every page cites the public health sources its factual claims are based on. Content involving medication, pregnancy, infants, asthma, and emergency situations is written conservatively, avoids dosing guidance, and directs readers to a pharmacist, physician, or emergency services rather than offering personalized recommendations.